There
are some Christian Churches or congregations who have withdrawn fellowship from
one another based upon doctrinal differences, and decisions arrived at by a
consensus of the membership and their congregational leaders; but is this the
way it should be done? This brief study will examine whether the New Testament
authorizes such an action as to ex-communicate entire faith communities over
issues that may or may not be all that serious.
Acts
15: 1-2a, 12-13, 19-21, 28
Certain people came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the
believers: “Unless
you are circumcised, according
to the custom taught by Moses, you
cannot be saved.” This
brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them. The whole assembly became silent as they listened to Barnabas
and Paul telling about the signs and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them. When they
finished, James spoke
up. “Brothers,” he said, “listen to me. It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it
difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20 Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain
from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. It
seemed good to the Holy Spirit and
to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements:
Acts
16: 1a, 4
Paul came to Derbe and
then to Lystra, where
a disciple named Timothy lived.
As they traveled from town to town, they delivered
the decisions reached by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem for the people to obey.
1
Corinthians 8: 1, 4, 7-8
Now about food sacrificed to idols: We
know that “We all possess knowledge.” But
knowledge puffs up while love builds up. So then, about eating food
sacrificed to idols: We
know that “An idol is nothing at all in the world” and that “There is no God but one.” But not everyone possesses this knowledge. Some people are still
so accustomed to idols that when they eat sacrificial food they think of it as
having been sacrificed to a god, and since their conscience is weak, it is defiled. But food does not bring us near to God; we are no worse if we
do not eat and no better if we do.
Acts
21: 17-18, 25
When we arrived at Jerusalem, the brothers and
sisters received us warmly. The next day Paul and the
rest of us went to see James, and
all the elders were
present. As for the
Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain
from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals
and from sexual immorality.”
NOTE: The leadership of the
Church in Jerusalem had heard some disturbing news about the Apostle Paul’s
teachings and they wanted to know whether the things they heard were true; and
they were which was in odds with the decrees that all who were present back in
Acts chapter 15 agreed upon. So, should the believers separate or disassociate
from the Apostle Paul and those he led to Christ because he no longer taught
the same thing as they did in this matter?
Here’s another example:
Galatians 2: 15-16a
We who are Jews by birth and not sinful Gentiles know
that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ.
Galatians
3: 11
Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified
before God, because “the righteous will live by faith.”
James 2: 18, 21-24
Yea, a man may say, Thou
hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will
shew thee my faith by my works. Was not Abraham our father justified by
works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith
wrought with his works and by works was faith made perfect? And the scripture was
fulfilled which said, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for
righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. Ye see then how that
by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Now, what would the Apostle Paul’s reply be to James
interpretation?
Romans 4: 1-3
What shall we say then
that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were
justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the
scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
Romans 4: 18-24
Who (Abraham) against hope believed in hope, that he
might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, so shall thy seed be. And being not weak in
faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an
hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah's womb: He staggered not at
the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to
God; And being fully persuaded that, what
he had promised, he was able also to perform. And therefore it was
imputed to him for righteousness. Now it was
not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him
that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;
NOTE: Should the congregations that are taught
justification by works separate from
those who are taught justification by faith;
I mean, who is right, Paul or James- can both of them be right?
Ok, one more point:
Acts 21: 17b, 20-21
Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of
Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: And they are informed of
thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake
Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to
walk after the customs.
Well, what did the Apostle Paul teach and were these
rumors true?
Galatians 5: 6a, 12
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any
value. As for those agitators, I wish they would go the whole way and
emasculate themselves!
Galatians 6: 15
Neither circumcision nor
uncircumcision means anything; what
counts is the new creation.
Colossians 2: 11, 6
In Him you were also
circumcised with a
circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ; therefore do not
let anyone judge you by what
you eat or drink, or with
regard to a religious festival, a New
Moon celebration or a
Sabbath day.
CONCLUSION:
The apostles and early leaders of the Christian movement didn’t
always agree on everything, even after Paul admonished the believers in Corinth
“I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the
name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what
you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly
united in mind and thought” (1 Corinthians 1: 10). There are examples of
instructions to withdraw from any believer who lives in a manner contrary to
the teachings of Christ or the indwelling Holy Spirit, but that is only as a
measure to bring the individual to repentance and to be welcomed back into the
fellowship and support of the local congregation. The practice of splitting and
forming a separate group or church is without authorization in the New
Testament and is counter to the injunction against divisions, factions, and
violates the spirit of unity. You can be
right but if the price is withdrawing from other believers over perhaps some
small matter of Biblical interpretation, then that might be too high a price to
pay. The thing that the Lord wants is, again, not to have division or cause a
stumbling block for other believers (Cp. Romans 14: 13; 1 Corinthians
8: 9; 10: 23; Galatians 5: 19a; and Proverbs 6: 16, 19b). Even
the Apostle Paul wrote that all things are lawful for him but all things are
not expedient (Cp. 1 Corinthians 6: 12; 10: 23).
Robert
Randle
776
Commerce St Apt 701
Tacoma,
WA 98402
May
19, 2017